> We're not even close to "all" territory.
I said trending in that direction, I didn't say we were in or close to that territory. The idea behind protests is not just to move out of some conceptual territory, but also to stop movement into such territory if we're headed in that direction.
> People are fired all the time because their job requirements changed, or they were made redundant. Where have the mass protests been for that?
When has there ever been talk of a society-wide policy which would forcibly unemploy 15% of the population that are otherwise fully qualified to continue to work in their current jobs? When have citizens ever had to carry papers around to enjoy the benefits of full citizenship?
Let's not pretend that the scenario we find ourselves in falls well within the boundaries of precedent.