There are a handful of Switch games that reach 60 fps, so it has a ton of promise, but a 2.0 release would certainly be great.
Basically if the game is fun, no one cares. If the game is not fun then they look for random excuses as to why.
Note: I'm not saying they wouldn't be better at 60. Rather Im saying they were multi-million unit sellers and made lots of people happy playing them and yet they were 30. So being 60 is not a requirement for being good.
That’s very dependent on the game.
Playing a racing game at 30fps is horrible. Playing Mario games 30fps. Is fine.
There is no category of games that would not improve in playability from 30 to 60 fps.
Not trying to be argumentative here. As mentioned upthread, I own 2 Switch consoles and the difference between 30 and 60 fps when running the same or similar games are stark. Perhaps i'm more sensitive than others.
I have 2 switches and I really can’t pick up Xbox or PS anymore. Except my dying wait for elden ring.
But yeah. I think minimum 60fps but depending on the game 30 is fine especially if it’s super fun.