Google has done really dark stuff with WiFi networks before, like when it came out that their StreetView cars were wardriving and intercepting data: https://www.wired.com/2012/05/google-wifi-fcc-investigation/
> The design document showed that, in addition to collecting data that Google could use to map the location of wireless access points, Engineer Doe intended to collect, store, and analyze payload data from unencrypted Wi-Fi networks
At this point, I’m skeptical of any data I provide Google; they are masterminds at combining multiple points of data into something useful.
This has a dual purpose.
From your perspective, that's true. It gives a better and faster lock on location.
But at the same time, it associate the WIFI with a location with the accuracy of a GPS.
So when you go into your laptop which has no GPS, the WiFi which you connect now has a real location association with it.
Presto. Now Google can track your real location on your laptop and any other WiFi enabled device.The phone can associate the SSID with a physical location. Maybe also a MAC address?
From a web browser on the laptop, they'll have the wi-fi network's IP address. They won't be told the SSID.
They'll have different pieces of information. I don't think it will help to work out your physical location from a laptop's web browser.
To associate a wi-fi network with a physical location that's helpful for tracking a laptop either: Your phone would need to authenticate to it and reach the internet to get the wi-fi network's IP address whilst on GPS Or: wi-fi networks you're not connected to need to be broadcasting their public MAC address- so far as I'm aware they don't
Obviously knowing every store you visit is very useful advertising data.
So to me it's kind of a baffling decision.
Your phone is already gathering a list of every SSID it touches every second. If Google can eliminate the need to use GPS to confirm that you are sitting at your desk, it can eliminate a bunch of needless GPS calculations.