> If you remove your bias, you'd find it within yourself that you would disagree with your own statement as well.
You don't know me, or what my experiences are. So please don't assume that I'm biased, simply because I have a different view than you. Likewise, please don't assume that I would share your view if I just understood things as well as you do.
I maintain a small amount of config files for vscode, a medium amount for vim, and a large amount for emacs+evil. I use all three editors for work, and have done so for years. The thing holding me back from switching to vscode fully is precisely the fact that it would take too much effort to customise it as well as I have customised vim and emacs.
Obviously your experience doesn't agree with mine, and I clearly can't say why. All I can say is that vim simply "clicked" for me when I first learnt it. I have coached enough coworkers that I can say the same thing applies to most people who take the time to learn the "vim way". And of course vim would not be as popular as it is, if that wasn't generally the case.
Perhaps vim simply doesn't speak to you. That's okay, nothing wrong with that.
But it's objectively complete nonsense to claim that vscode does not require a substantial time-investment if you really want to super-power it. And that has nothing to do with the editor, it has everything to do with the fact that the editing experience is highly individual. If you really think you will move onto the next vscode with ease, all that tells me is that you won't take the time to learn the tool.