> Abortion and adoption is realistic options for possible children
Abortion, ok.
But do you mean putting your own, healthy kids up for adoption???
Abortion, ok.
But do you mean putting your own, healthy kids up for adoption???
And there are different degrees of "more important". "Throwing the kids away" is a super extreme measure few would take.
I hate it when during internet discussions, suddenly the other side slides on a slippery slope all the way to Level 99.
Your single without children?
Adoption may be the best option for some people in some situations. I can imagine that. But presenting it as an obvious solution to this problem indicates a glaring gap in their understanding of human beings.