At this point unmaintained roads are the least of Illinois' concerns. The state has massively underfunded state pensions combined with a fleeing and aging population that probably means some for of bankruptcy protection in the not so distant future. Before that happens all available money will be used to fund pension payouts due to how politics works in Illinois and the roads will start looking like a set of a Mad Max movie.
Source: I was born and raised in Illinois (~40 miles from Galesburg) and most of my family still lives there.
I don't know for sure but if it is anything like New York and upstate, I suspect you will find Chicago pays for you guys much more than you think. I think it is almost guaranteed that overa Chicago pays for you and not the other way around, the only question is magnitude.
In any case, diverting money from road construction to public transit is a good thing.
The other big factor we have is that there’s a lot of soft subsidy built in with things like minimum parking requirements, and a lot of both road and parking infrastructure is paid for by developers when first constructed but falls back to the city or private owners for maintenance. That will only make the current imbalance worse over time.
> The math works out that an empty 18-wheeler causes 80,000 times more damage than my plug-in. When it’s fully loaded, it causes 208,000 time more damage. Both reports conclude that heavy trucks cause over 99 percent of the road and bridge damage, yet the trucking industry contributes only 35 percent of the road taxes.
https://www.concordmonitor.com/Wear-and-tear-on-the-roads-23...
Eliminate the gas tax, just charge directly based on the amount of road use.
[0] https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Downloads/...
(1) https://www.deutschlandinzahlen.de/tab/deutschland/infrastru...
If the tax brings in €9.4B and the expenses are €10B per year, that seems pretty balanced to me.
[1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stra%C3%9Fenbaubeitrag [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPdigJ6dOL8