But he actually was censored.
Just the fact that he is censored makes him worth amplifying. They have granted him minor martyrdom. I would not have bothered listening, but now I will, just to defy the censors.
And if he truly had nothing worth hearing, then he should have been ignored like a creationist. Nobody censors creationists.
You are blaming him for "provoking" his censorship.
If the church systematically had an artist censored and marginalized for making blasphemous art, I imagine that you would not blame the artist for provoking the Catholic league or whoever. Even if this artist/scientist/journalist did specifically make something that they knew would piss off those in power, that does not excuse or justify their treatment.
There have always been self appointed protectors of information, and it is our duty to stand up to them, because they are a bigger threat to our safety than anyone they would silence.
Please don't be a toady for the billionaires who want to prevent us from listening to podcasts that they don't like.