Not guilty of endangering thousands of lives by running fraudulent and inaccurate tests under sub-par lab conditions.
Our justice system is such a farce.
*(Fixed grammar error specified below)
Our prison population reflects our crime rate demographics. Certain demographics commit far more crime, especially violent crime, than other demographics. They are represented accordingly in our prisons.
Justice is pretty fair and blind across the board. Do the crime then do the time.
If not here where would you rather draw the line? Incarcerate 1 more innocents s that 1 more guilty makes it into jail?
We could have a more likely than not standard of 51% chance like civil law, and 49% of inmates are innocent.
Would you personally really want to send someone to prison if you had reasonable doubts of their guilt?
"When Theranos' machines were rolled out to Walgreens stores in California and Arizona, they gave patients false or flawed results. One patient testified that she was led to believe she was having a miscarriage after taking a Theranos test, when indeed her pregnancy was viable. Another patient thought her cancer had returned when it had not, following a test. But in the end, jurors did not believe that Holmes intentionally deceived patients."
These examples by themselves are clear instances of harm. However, it's not unlikely that more patients were affected and perhaps even some of them took actions that were harmful to their health based on this false data.