Well...just to be play devil's advocate here for a sec...I don't know if that's the case, but just based on the vote it seems a bit fishy to me.

89-9 means many Republicans were on-board. The stereotype for the 'typical' Republican positions are torte reform and less interference with business process.

So just by that reasoning alone, if this was Big Law Firm (only) friendly, it seems to me that so many republicans wouldn't have supported it.

I am just putting forth a theory, as I was not party to the negotiations so I don't know for sure.