> Why they didn't go with BLAKE3, I can't say.
Maybe people just liked it better that way?
Maybe people just liked it better that way?
It also seems to be almost as fast according to the BLAKE3 specs PDF (page 11).
https://github.com/BLAKE3-team/BLAKE3-specs/blob/master/blak...
but it just BLAKE2, BLAKE3 got a nope
SHA1's a long time gone, that crypto's a slowpoke
Why did BLAKE3 and SHA1 get the works?
That's nobody's business, even Turks!