What happens with immune system if you get booster shots every 3 months for, let’s say, 3 years?
Their slogan is literally "the wind of freedom blows". Has the wind stopped blowing?
Eroding the foundations of democracy and modern thought in the repeated failed attempts to prevent the spread of covid is extremely stupid. I really wonder if people like you are even aware of how miserably every single policy aimed at slowing the spread of covid has failed.
1) lockdown to prevent the spread - did nothing, covid spread rapidly the moment the lockdowns ended, and we did nothing to prepare for it during the time of the lockdowns. We didn't build hospitals, we didn't train nurses, we simply wasted money.
2) Masks Mandates - A minor slow of the spread at the cost of erosion of freedoms, you don't have to be an anti masker to realize this, and the production of huge amounts of waste.
3) More Lockdowns - Same thing as first time.
4) Vaccines - We were promised this was the end, but thanks to people who think like you we pushed the idea that we don't need long term studies we can simply trust big pharma to tell the truth.
Remember this: https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-deta..., here they "Vaccine candidate was found to be more than 90% effective in preventing COVID-19 in participants without evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first interim efficacy analysis"
This is simply a lie. There vaccine literally never was 90% effective in the real world, and currently their vaccine actually has negative efficacy in preventing omnicron.
5) Vaccine Mandates - Look around you. They did absolutely nothing. 6) Booster Mandates - ... if you still believe this can work there is nothing that can be said.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.20.21267966v...
Yet another point in favor of "Let's not presume until the studies have been completed."
That's from the linked paper. The authors don't claim at all that the vaccine has negative efficacy, and the study is simply not set up to measure that anyway. You cannot draw this conclusion from the data in this paper.
Personally, I think it's a statistical fluke, and was going to argue that it must be due to a smaller sample size until I saw the width of the confidence intervals (CI's get narrower as observations increase).
Very odd, and I'll be surprised if that makes it through peer review intact.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3949410
It stands to reason that the unvaccinated at this point are in large parts hermits who are "protected" by their lifestyle. However, it's also plausible that the non-neutralizing antibodies from the vaccine induce a suboptimal immune response with Omikron.
> Eroding the foundations of democracy and modern thought in the repeated failed attempts to prevent the spread of covid is extremely stupid.
Quarantine and vaccinations as solutions to infectious, deadly diseases is older than the US. They were even used by the founding fathers in the war for independence.
And not once could they even get to stage 3 clinical trials. This should be a red flag, not something used to promote them.
Look at how many vaccines active service members are required to have for example
And why is what the military mandates on people meaningful whatsoever? Review some history on what the military has mandated in the past.
Trusting common sense is the opposite of Science.
The scientific method does prove common sense incorrect a lot of times (eg there is a maximum possible speed) but it doesn’t mean that all of common sense is wrong.