> The people listed in the study are all female

> strongly suggests that this is a diversity initiative in disguise

It would be great if we can use this logic backwards.

For any team or initiative we see that is all male, we treat it like a discrimination initiative in disguise.

If you don't treat every situation of the above of all male teams/projects/funds like that, I am not sure why you do so in this case.

---

Edit: Update formatting