Intrigued by this exact question a long time ago, I took a look at some of Bellard's earlier projects.

I studied a bit of a partial implementation of an OpenGL software renderer written by him. I even found a bug I could fix!

Actually his first projects were not all that advanced, they are things "normal people" could do. I think key lies down to 3 points:

  - Start simple: do not try advanced projects at first, start slow, plan, don't write the first function before you know what will be the last. Use this for many small but increasingly complex projects to gain experience.

  - Understand what you do: most of the most notorious Bellard's projects are complex but based on many simple smaller moving parts and based on simple, understandable concepts. If the first point is respected, this one comes naturally.

  - Be regular: do what you need/want but do it regularly. If you look at what Bellard does in a single day, it doesn't seem that different from what most people can do in a single day. But he does it with incredible regularity.

I think these are points that most people can follow. You may not get to his level, but you will certainly be a solid developer. If you're lucky to start projects that the "right people" need, you can see what separates devs like Torvalds or Bellard from other equally solid developers: they developed projects that attracted strong contributors. Think about the guy writing SerenityOS: he's probably as solid as one can be; nevertheless, there's a very small probability SerenityOS will ever be as commonplace as ffmpeg. And that doesn't mean it is not fantastic, neither SerenityOS or its developer.

Now, in Bellard's case there's just on more special thing: he is a gifted mathematician. That certainly helps being a good developer and planner too, but turning into a mathematician of his level also takes another level of discipline.

Cálmate, my friend...pretty sure the comment was a light hearted joke.

> I know and respect Fabrice from in person interactions. He is exactly who he claims to be. Maybe an interesting question, instead of this current line of discussion, is to find out what led to his successes?

While I think the GP was a joke, you ask an interesting question that I tried to answer 12 days ago on this very site. [1]

tl;dr: I'm not fast, but I'm getting faster because I understand my entire codebase. I think that may be a good portion of Mr. Bellard's success, or if it is not, it may be the best way for mere mortals to emulate his success.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29533412

I think it's a joke dude!

I guess it was a joke about the 10x developer(s)

1) A profound interest in programming for its own sake.

2) More money than God.

Also helps: zero fucks to give about maintaining the damn thing.

How can it be funded?

I would love to work more on open source.

I was thinking.Erin Hunter but tomato tomato.

Pretty much.

Or, perhaps more likely, sowing the seeds for humanities demise by enabling the existence of YouTube/TikTok et al.

Mate, it was a joke. Nobody seriously think he is several people.

It's based on using it, not reading it. It's not hype. There just isn't anyone comparable out there.