I see it the opposite..
I see it the opposite..
but no, I weigh them comparably, depending on the specific "arts" you mean. Maths > painting, but philosophy > chemistry.
i didnt provide a definition for liberal arts.
also your own link is contradictory to your earlier comments...
> Academic areas that are associated with the term liberal arts include:
Life sciences (biology, ecology, neuroscience) Physical science (physics, astronomy, chemistry, physical geography) Logic, mathematics, statistics, computer science Philosophy History Social science (anthropology, economics, human geography, linguistics, political science, jurisprudence, psychology, and sociology) Creative arts (fine arts, music, performing arts, literature)
this states that philosophy and biology are both liberal arts. Along with physics and other STEM topics. Linking this implies you agree that STEM is important, as much so as Philosophy, which i agree is an important topic along with all those in this link.
- general education is useful
- pragmatic education is a step above general education, and should be prioritised
- maths is pragmatic, most STEM is not
that's really all there is to it.