I’m not going to deny your point on killing. That is one application of firearms, also a powerful one, but I don’t feel that’s a reason to absolutely prohibit them for the common folk. As we’re both on HN I’m sure you also don’t “get” why folks just love some things like I do.
For me it’s the history, appreciation of the engineering, and my now civilian hobbies of hunting and competition shooting. They are one of many things that bring me joy that I would hate to lose in my healthy years.
And it doesn't have to be about killing. We play shooting like people play darts. Hit the target for fun.
True if you are a solider. Not so for most other people.
Honestly, please explain what the true definition of a liberal mindset is?
https://www.britannica.com/topic/liberalism/Classical-libera...
BTW. As a consequence of my hobby, I have begun finding the history of handguns interesting though. I have also started to appreciate the human-scale mechanical engineering and the design for usability and ergonomics. Gun designers don't mess about with the user interface when it is literally a matter of life and death.
Oh, there were plenty of gun designers who did mess up the ergonomics big time - it's just that these are the guns you learn in the history of "why we don't do things like that anymore" class.
For example, many early SMGs were prone to feeding failures if the magazine was disturbed. At the same time, the magazine well is basically a natural forward vertical grip - and this was even more true on designs like MP40, where it's so far from the pistol grip. MP40 was supposed to be held with supporting hand gripping the handguard behind the magazine, but malfunctions induced by magwell grip were extremely common in practice.
I don't have any prejudice against guns, but probably less fascination than seen ITT. I have fired a single shot in the last six months, and the result is in my deep freeze.