It is obvious that the Federalist is appealing to outrage with those headlines; which makes it quite hard to take seriously. But those headlines are legitimate issues. The right wing is being forced in to a position where it needs to build its own internet infrastructure, which is a big deal. The headline manages to make it sound stupid but that doesn't change the fact that it is worthy of being headline news.

And again with Baby Killing vs Boosters - one of the two papers is much better at writing headlines, but both of those go to largely the same issue which is how the state should interfere with individual medical decisions.

If you ignore the fact that the Federalist is targeting people who don't appreciate good writing, the dismissal of one and favouring of the other isn't as obvious.