An NFT is a URL. Anyone can sell URLs pointing to anything.
I can mint and sell NFTs of something you hold the rights to and there's nothing legally wrong with it.
I can mint and sell NFTs of something you hold the rights to and there's nothing legally wrong with it.
If you don’t actually present an image of a Disney character on the site, there is nothing preventing an NFT referring to one.
I certainly don’t see the value in releasing NFTs that represent public domain images if they don’t come with actual utility.
They're the same as any NFT really. Do people really care about the art quality of their apes? The whole gimmick is they're supposed to appreciate in value for some reason. So why couldn't a public domain image appreciate in value too?