"My g/f earns about a third of what I do while actually working a tough, stressful job in full time"
There is only one thing i learned, life is deeply unfair, meritocracy is a myth, and noone knows why most things are the way they are.
There is only one thing i learned, life is deeply unfair, meritocracy is a myth, and noone knows why most things are the way they are.
Allowing inheritance from one generation to another is an immediate disqualifier for meritocracy as well. As is the existence of private schooling bought with money.
Inheritance has nothing to do with meritocracy. One can argue about whether or how much inheritance should be taxed -- but that's a wholly separate, topic.
Hiring, raises, and promotions should not be based on skin color, eye color, gender, or other immutable traits. In a meritocracy, these are instead determined _solely_ by how provably capable a person is (per Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s prescription).
In fact, Meritocracy _would_ explicitly reject the idea of "inheriting" a job (as is done in orgs with nepotism), so I'm confused as to what your point is.
You really pick 'equity' as the example? I get thats it fashionable to hate on woke politics around these parts, but aren't your forgeting that most of the world is more like Russia, i.e. jungle, where stongest rules because they can, with mirderous intent.
I mean if you are talking about principles of life, its got to be universal, not just applying in a handfull of fortunate countries.
The principles of we go by, they are in conflict with one another.
Everything is "unfair" from a perspective. Two people working the exact same job and putting in the same effort, if one person packs twice the number of boxes it would also be unfair to pay them the same as the other person who is creating only half the value for the person paying them.
if so, then training somebody to become a SEng involves more costs, than training smb to mop a floor.
the guy u responding didn't mention the job his gf does, thus assuming that she's the same software dev, would be a wrong thing to do, i believe.
besides that, she even may obtain the same level, the same set of skills as he does, thus she also has the same opportunity as he does.
that being said there is nothing to discuss about meritocracy, yet i agree with the fact that things are not that meritocratic as we want them to be. why? because there is always an asymmetry in a market, and contracts may always have some flaws (for e.g.: lemon market).
i perceive the case of him since he's not that tired as his gf is. that's just the basic compassion that one wants to feel, and even empathy.
> that being said there is nothing to discuss about meritocracy, yet i agree with the fact that things are not that meritocratic as we want them to be. why? because there is always an asymmetry in a market, and contracts may always have some flaws (for e.g.: lemon market).