Could civilization actually end like this? Not in a big bang but slowly grinding to a halt because no one knows how stuff works besides some nonfunctional web forms?
Could civilization actually end like this? Not in a big bang but slowly grinding to a halt because no one knows how stuff works besides some nonfunctional web forms?
Maybe Hacker News was able to stay home for months but none of my friends making minimum wage--sorry, essential workers--ever got a break. I think you're dramatically overestimating how many people actually got to stay home and for how long. And obviously there's big class divisions between who does and doesn't get to stay home as well
Speak for yourself. A branch of my extended family all starved to death, together with lots of people in their town, and I was talking to them every day, but still couldn't get them food in time.
It likely wouldn't have happened without the pandemic. Staple food prices have gone up a lot (like more than double in some regions), and availability gone way down because the one guy with the truck decides to not deliver to the more remote regions cos he's making more money now doing more local deliveries.
Do you have thoughts on what could have prevented this at a system level?
People at those margins then die when conditions change. I wish those people weren't family. But if it weren't them, it would have been someone else.
May I ask which country this happened in?
I'm sorry for your loss. I can't imagine a whole branch of the family tree dying.
Can you say where this happened?
also, I did have to go without my preferred brands of couscous and fresh olives for some months, so as far as i’m concerned the end was nigh
The people working the line in the factory need to go to the factory. However my company was paranoid that something would happen to them. If enough people working the line get sick production stops and then all profit stops. By contrast if a lot of people not on the line are sick but production continues - over a year is balances out.
Notice how we have a backlog of ships to unload and not empty ships? That’s because factories continued operations.
You just summarized the Idiocracy plot.
But you do have a point... just look how much money companies are willing to shell out for IBM mainframes (new hardware that has cycle-accurate emulation of 70s-era hardware) or for pensioners who lived and breathed COBOL. So many large-scale IT projects in government or corporations fail because of the boatload of undocumented assumptions and edge cases that have been built up over many decades, or don't even get started because of the effort that a migration brings.
No.
I'll give you a clear counter-example: my iPhone 13 mini.
Go read an iFixit teardown of any advanced product like that. Many state-of-the art chips, many suppliers, a huge logistics effort.
And yet Verizon managed to send me one of the damn things just a few days after I ordered, shortly after the phones were introduced.
Sure, some people trying to fund their product using kickstarter have problems, but the big boys can build and deliver hundreds of millions of "supercomputers" per year.
You'll be interested in this talk, "Preventing the Collapse of Civilization"