Besides, I find if wired when people use globalist like some sort of insult. As if wanting the whole world to be better and more connected is a bad thing.
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-how-did-the-term-gl...
Also, while you may have had purely innocent intentions note that your use of that term apparently made someone else feel safe calling me an anti-Jewish slur and telling me to kill myself: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29521708
The other downside to Monero is it's proof of work, which means it needs lots of power to mine. I suppose the ideal crypto would have privacy like Monero and be proof of stake, but proof of stake is still in its infancy.
I'm just not convinced that crypto will necessarily make the world a better place. It's going to simply be different, with different tradeoffs.
Monero is interesting, but its privacy is also an advantage and disadvantage. I am a big fan of Ethereum, personally. It's much more alive, much more dynamic, and actively responds to poignant critics of crypto, as opposed to BTC, which to me sounds way more religious than I'm comfortable with.
The opposite is nationalist not isolationist. Ie doing what’s best for ones country and country men, not the world at large. At least in the context being discussed.
Also you listed “trade” with no qualifier. Is the entire concept of trading a path to one world government? That’s a pretty serious leap in logic.
You may be right but you offer no evidence, only shoot the messenger.