Which is why I'm very happy over this move by Hetzner. More monetary incentive to move away from IPv4 is exactly what we need to break the cycle of "nobody uses IPv6, so nothing supports it, so nobody uses it"
Which is why I'm very happy over this move by Hetzner. More monetary incentive to move away from IPv4 is exactly what we need to break the cycle of "nobody uses IPv6, so nothing supports it, so nobody uses it"
It's not really a solution to the problem, it's usually just ignoring the problem and hiding the symptoms.
I'm surprised Hetzner is the first to do this, it's an obvious move with the sharp rise of IPv4 addresses. Most companies don't need IPv4 anyway, because their infrastructure usually ends up at a caching proxy or CDN regardless. Your backend API servers will usually also be talked to by other servers, which usually also run from a place with widespread IPv6 addresses.
I can see a (bleak) future where consumers are all om CG-NAT and everything but the frontend is running IPv6 as a cost cutting measure.
Many people are pretty adept at making sure the fingers don’t point at them.
sounds like business as usual
But you don't any more, and prices are increasing fast: https://docs.hetzner.com/general/others/ipv4-pricing/