Emacs’ biggest drawback is that you are never using it to the fullest—an issue this article makes painfully clear to me. I guess it’s time to break out my config and tweak it… for the third time today…
Do you have a link about this by any chance?
See e.g. "unix, a history and a memoir" by Brian kernigan
Nobody can ever do that, so it's pointless to ask.
(I suppose that if you built your own editor this might be true, but if you have your own plane then you're never early or late to your flight either.)
Either way other people using a tool or not using a tool shouldn't effect you doing the same.
I think that this is actually a strength.
If you're using your editor to its fullest, then that means that there's no more room for you to improve. If your editor is simple, then its "fullest" isn't very good. If your editor is complex, then it took you a long time to get to its "fullest", and you hit diminishing returns a while ago.
Emacs is great because the skill gap is ridiculously high, while the skill curve isn't very sharp (Emacs' modeless editing is straight-up easier to learn than vim's modal editing, whatever other people might say), so wherever you are, you can always learn a little bit more, and be a little bit more productive...or continue to work with what you have.
That is - you can stop learning Emacs exactly when you want to - no sooner, no later. If you have a relatively simple editing task, you can just start it up, use the arrow keys to navigate, then save and quit (three keybindings total? find-file, save-buffer, save-buffers-kill-terminal). If you're anticipating starting a career in programming, you can learn and improve your skill with it (and your config) continuously for decades. I don't know of any other tool that's as good at this as Emacs is.
On a tangent, I would propose to you that Emacs' greatest weakness is that it doesn't come configured out of the box. It's way easier to set up VSCode to do Python than it is Emacs, and that's going to be the final factor for a large fraction of programmers. If two editors are equally flexible (which isn't actually the case with Emacs vs. VSCode, but bear with me), the one with the better out-of-the-box experience will win. (and this is why I think that starter kits like Doom and Spacemacs are the only way for Emacs to survive)
I should have added a "/s" in there. :) I'm 100% with you on basically everything you've said. I totally agree that the biggest weakness is how bad the default Emacs experience is. I used vanilla Emacs in a terminal for years until I discovered I could install packages. What a world that opened up.
I disagree, this is not a linear question. Emacs supports many different styles of working, and you aren't required to use anything to it's fullest. You might be using avy and other manipulation packages, or clicking around with the mouse (perhaps with your own commands bound to special kinds of mouse clicks) and it would be just as OK. You might always learn something tomorrow, but that shouldn't keep you from going on today.
That’s true of your phone (or every computer). It’s one of the manifold weaknesses of (shudder) Word.