Interesting talk, I wonder how much of the perf. advantage diminishes in a finished, production-ready implementation though.
Comparing an 80%-complete R&D prototype mule against crash-resilient posix-compliant production filesystems is basically never a fair perf. comparison.
You might find that just implementing rename and hard-links properly alone is going to kill your perf. since you dispensed with on-disk inode equivalents.
Nice to see people poking at these issues nonetheless, Linux needs better filesystem options.