If this is what gets "taught" around the dinner table at home ... then in such a house, all STEM education will be moot.
If this is what gets "taught" around the dinner table at home ... then in such a house, all STEM education will be moot.
The NIH has been caught funding gain of function there.
So, sure go ahead and dismiss it as conspiracy but at this point you're the one sounding more like a conspiracy theorist by denying the ever growing evidence.
In the same sense that to a Creationist, "all indications point to" the fact that Homo Sapiens first appeared on earth around 6,000 BCE and could not have evolved from other species. And that "evolution" in general is basically a myth fostered by an atheistic academic elite.
If it's what you're determined to believe, then hey, it's what you're gonna believe.
In this example you're the creationist denying the ever growing evidence. You'd be the one out there calling Darwin a scam artist.
There's one of two things going on here:
1. You're ignorant of what's actually going on. 2. You're malicious
You can be forgiven for #1 but you really need to take your blinders off and maybe consider some different news sources.