Hacker News Reader

Comment by asddubs | Hacker News Reader

chrome does have anti-patterns, they're just far more insidious. like being logged into google meaning also being logged into the browser. they continuous refusal to block 3rd party cookies in any way, due to also being an advertisement company that massively benefits from them

View on HN

didn't Google plan to block all third parties cookies this year but have to delay due to regulatory pressure?

https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/24/22547339/google-chrome-co...

Yup. Pushed back till Q3 2023 now. https://privacysandbox.com/timeline/

IMO it's going to get pushed back even further. Their FLoC and other tracking-but-not tech is getting pushback, and they're not going to sacrifice revenue for privacy.

they pushed it back to allow for more time to figure out new ways to do targeted advertisement, because everyone hated their FLoC system. this is once again, google acting in its own interest as an advertisement company.

"EU’s Margrethe Vestager Confirms That Google’s Planned Removal Of Third-Party Cookies Is An Antitrust Concern" https://www.adexchanger.com/privacy/eus-margrethe-vestager-c...

seems like google cant win

Google can't win? Their idea of removing third party cookies was on the condition everybody would accept FLoC, so Google still makes money while everybody else doesn't. Yes, it's an antitrust concern.

You spread misinformation. Any ad company can use FLoC.

Let me be very explicit for you: privacy advocates say 3rd party cookies are bad b/c they allow tracking yet the eu blocks google from removing them b/c they think it might hurt their own ad tracking companies.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com