Yes, I'm fine with people experimenting on stuff like Solana or Cardano.
CryptoA != CryptoB. Specifics matter, _a lot_
It takes 128gb of RAM just to run a Solana node. Higher system requirements = less decentralized. Fewer people can join the network. They also pump up their transactions-per-second numbers since they count proof-of-stake votes as transactions.
Cardano has a centralized development team. Whereas Ethereum invests in multiple, independent development teams. This means that a software bug is less likely to take out the entire network. Additionally the founder of Cardano is known to be a bit of a pathological liar and was kicked off the Ethereum team because of this and the fact that he wanted to take Ethereum private.
This is all stuff that anyone can look up.
In any case, the "unique characteristics of Bitcoin" are what makes it abhorrent.
I just mentioned the two top PoS crypto, but anything that doesn't gobble resources as a byproduct of the network security cost is fine. I agree that Cardano is run by a maniac and Solana is centralized and too affiliated with scammers (SBF)
PoS Ethereum would be fine by me, but they've been saying they'll switch forever, so I'll believe it when I see it.
Resorting to a such a fallacy is generally a sign you have nothing defensible to say about the absurd waste BTC produces
Even if you want to change the subject, I can't get a GPU because 1/5th of the GPU supply is shipped to ETH mines.
Regarding GPUs did it ever occur to you that YOU are wasting electricity? From my perspective I'm trying to use crypto to create a better world.