> You should try to reconsider what you think you know about the people who disagree with you, because you are absolutely incorrect and borderline delusional.
You are doing exactly what you're insulting. Some self reflection is in order.
You are doing exactly what you're insulting. Some self reflection is in order.
He didn't though. Unless you do show off how much better you are at following The Rules on a regular basis. And yet you called him "borderline delusional".
So if you don't think the pandemic is over, you are on the wrong side of the "culture war".
> screaming about The Science, and narcissists showing how much better they are at following The Rules than you.
This could be Twitter people or it could be people wearing masks in public. You don't know what this person meant outside of the context provided here. Given how they think that all that remains is a culture war, I took it to mean people who don't think the pandemic is over, so they wear masks and continue to social distance (you know, because we want people to know we can follow rules). Regardless, it reads as though it was written to be intentionally inflamatory to people like me who do not think it's over, or, at least won't act as though it is until a plan is communicated. I think you know that it was inflammatory. So your reading of it to not not include me as its target of criticism is of no interest to me. If I said "idiots who respond to my comments" and you rightly pointed out that it's not nice to call people idiots, how would you respond to a third commenter saying "well, he's not talking about you, he's talking about idiots."