That's interesting - talking about Chinese hegemony and ignoring 750 US bases worldwide and all the misery they brought all around the world - South America, SE Asia, Middle East...
Of course Chinese hegemony is no better. Any hegemony is no better than another...
You didn't explain that.
And please, stop using communists to refer to anything on earth. There is no such thing as communist nowadays. If you think there is a communist in China, that person probably will be shunned as one would be in USA...
So what system do you have to propose, and how is it better? Remember that your explanation must explain how International Democracy avoids interacts with conflict between nations, how it maintains the global economy, in particular the safety of the shipping lanes and banking systems / currency exchanges. You must be able to adjudicate border disputes and prevent large nations from claiming large swaths of sea as territory. You must be able to explain how your system avoids becoming a tyranny of the richest, strongest, or most cunning states, as well as how it remains stable and doesn't become anarchy.
Good luck.
As the first step, let's make sure everyone goes through UN for any cross national conflict. Like if US unilaterally invade Iraq, US should be sanctioned according to some agreed upon rules. Etc etc.
When you say UN works because of US support, that's a problem. UN needs to hold actual power, not at the mercy of a few super powers.
One step to allow UN actual power, is to grant UN the ability to draft financial resources from member nations, and let UN invest on the behalf of all people on earth.
Simple fact is that there's no Chinese hegemony now and there won't be one in foreseeable future because there's existing hegemon that won't just give up.
btw one man's whataboutism is another man's uncovering of hypocrisy.
They didn't say anything about the USA hegemony being bad just that they didn't want a Chinese one. How is that hypocrisy?
The alternative being Russian (or rather, USSR) bases.
Yeah, pretty sure citizens of the countries with bases would rather have the US as a partner rather than the alternative.