A lock on a toilet does this. The ability to hide your IP address does this.
A lock on a toilet does this. The ability to hide your IP address does this.
― Edward Snowden
"Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care if someone watches you take a shit because you eat healthy food." - LocalH
The 4th amendment was penned back when you would have had to physically search my house or business for paperwork to learn anything about my financial books, I really believe that the original authors intended for me to mind my own business and the government and everyone else to mind theirs.
Freedom was free agency to exist and thrive in the land, unmolested and protected from encroachment from others by the government, rather than being a subject of the nation and a pawn of the government.
Taxes were something taken at ports during import/export, now not only is the representative system turned upside down but the federal tax collectors have turned inward.
The federal government was suppose to be an entity of management for external foreign relationships and mediation between states, now it’s getting close to mandating individuals to which private bathrooms they are allowed to invade.
I found that this one doesn't work on Americans, they have some crazy 2 inch gap around the door haha
That """argument""" is what people without any experience, just come out a cave hours ago, could put in their head. Under Pol Pot, people had to hide eyeglasses. And this is just an example that stands for many other instances.
Why should the average be relevant. Phrased this way, it seemed that the object of concern are the grayest.
> with non-controversial [positions]
Are those who decide what takes the label of "controversial" reliable?
> Are those who decide what takes the label of "controversial" reliable?
No -- but the average person who finds themselves squarely within the Overton window will not find that concerning.