Hacker News Reader

I know this doesn't answer your question, but can I just ask (out of curiosity) why you're training ML models on a laptop?

View on HN

It’s all about the RAM. 64GB would allow input of larger image sizes and/or nets with more parameters. Right now, the consumer card with the most RAM is the rtx 3090 which is only 24GB, and in my opinion overpriced and inefficient in terms of wattage (~350W). Even the ~$6000 RTX A6000 cards are only 48GB.

I don't think replacing a workstation with a Macbook because of RAM makes too much sense: If running one minibatch of your model already takes up all the memory you have, where would the rest of your training data sit? In the M1, you don't have a separate main memory.

Also, software support for accelerated training on Apple hardware is extremely limited: Out of the main frameworks, only tensorflow seems to target it, and even there, the issues you'll face won't be high on the priority list.

I know that nvidia GPUs are very expensive, but if you're really serious about training a large model, the only alternative would be paying rent to Google.

Good points. I look forward to some benchmarks. Just hoping for an alternative to Nvidia sooner than later. Dreaming apple will solve it and offer a 1.5 TB mac pro.

Is this much different than asking why someone would do _any_ work on a laptop?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com