I bet barely anyone would care if it was still United Fruit Company.
In an age of ethical consumerism, it's undeniable that not breaking with the past would've had a significant impact on their profits.
Does anyone really think clothing brands are avoiding Xinjiang cotton if their product still comes from China or another south/east Asian country?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Fruit_Company
Some entries in the table of contents sound a bit embarrassing, like "Banana massacre" and "Aiding and abetting a terrorist organization". Description of a coup is to be found if someone reads the entry about Guatemela.
Various other top DDG results are about the same three things, dictionary entries and Pablo Neruda's poem.
[1] https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffcm&q=United+Fruit+Company&ia=web