Hacker News Reader

You do know that there's a difference between an opinion poll and a research study, right?

Edit;

Since most of the comments in this thread are garbage concern trolling about the nature of scientific consensus that literally could've been written by Exxon's PR team, here's a link to the actual study:

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966

I 100% think humans caused global warming. But still the argument is bad

The methodology here appears to have been doing a keyword search among some 88k papers published between 2012 and 2020. It's obvious to me that humans have caused changes, but this methodology seems awfully lazy.

In addition to the sibling comment, a low percent chance is very different from a 0% chance. Think of it as Trump being a first-time gambler who wins the jackpot.

You are coping. Trump had more votes than an averahe republican