That the article poses the philosophical works as being part of the definition of the word.
From the opening:
"Kairos (Ancient Greek: καιρός) is an Ancient Greek word meaning the right, critical, or opportune moment.[1] The ancient Greeks had two words for time: chronos (χρόνος) and kairos. The former refers to chronological or sequential time, while the latter signifies a proper or opportune time for action. While chronos is quantitative, kairos has a qualitative, permanent nature."
Whereas actually, from Greek speakers here, the difference is that chronos is when you say "it's taking a long time", and kairos is when you say "it's time for lunch". All that "proper or opportune time for action"? "Qualitative, permanent nature"? That is a very specialized usage, mostly used in foreign languages.