> "We could not see the article, source, or that link."
That's exactly the point of saying people are "jumping to conclusions".
That's exactly the point of saying people are "jumping to conclusions".
You and the top level are doing the same but to the commenters- it's just one step further down and I feel the jokey aspect has been lost in favour of the internet's favourite response type: mild outrage over nothing
Ooh we could call it a MOON response
Comments making fun of a site praising jamstack being down are jumping to two conclusions: the site is itself is using jamstack and the praise of jamstack is for use in blogs. That's what the commenter above pointed out.
When I point out that these commenters are jumping to conclusions I am not jumping to conclusions. It is pretty clear that they are associating the use of jamstack and the site being down.
My blog isn’t Jam. It’s a ghost on T2.micro. This hit the FP and it didn’t like it.
Can’t help but think if it was Jam it wouldn’t of gone down. Then again I like the editor for ghost.
Either way, I’m not protective over Jamstack, this whole situation is ironic and funny.