Just look at how they realized that misinformation upset people which in turn caused them to interact with the site more, so they allowed that misinformation to spread.
There is also past research that involved trying to manipulate the emotions of users without the user's consent (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/17470161155995...).
They take a lot of the things that I dislike about social networks and technology and turn it to 11.
Snapchat, Pinterest, Discord (sort of), Youtube (sort of) can round out that social media sites list. Probably a few more not being thought of.
We'll circle back to Google next week, and repeat.
It's the political equivalent of "No one ever got fired for buying IBM". It's the safest opinion you can have, so everyone will spout out without reserve because no one will challenge you on it, and if they do they're clearly just a Zuck bootlicker.