Just take it.
Just take it.
J. S. Mill wrote the rebuttal to your argument 160+ years ago. He wasn't using it as an anti-vaxx argument either, so it might be time to stop the moralising and simply try to make a persuasive case. I'd wager it's easier without the moralising anyway.
Factually false.
1. It isn't a vaccine. It's a chemical signal to make your body make things.
2. It doesn't have the efficacy against the plethora of variants that all coronaviruses like the cold continuously create. You can still get COVID-19 after being "fully vaccinated". Human beings lack the technology to vaccinate against coronaviruses, including COVID and the cold.
3. It has caused blood clots. And the proteins created cluster in reproductive organs.
4. There are no long term studies of its effects.
5. If it kills your spouse, you can't sue the manufacturer.
Stop spreading misinformation about this pseudo-vaccine.
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseas...
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/21/who-repeats-warning-against-...
There are multiple vaccines too! The Australian regulator recommends against some vaccines for the young and up until recently they were the only ones available.
https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-...
I'm sure there are plenty of other reasons - God forbid you might even have a religious objection to vaccines.