This is equivalent to saying: "paid labour may never be cost-competitive enough to replace slavery".
Sure, "traditional meat" is cheaper. But that's because it involves the torture and murder of animals.
Sure, "traditional meat" is cheaper. But that's because it involves the torture and murder of animals.
Expensive technologies win a lot of market share only if no other alternative can work, and even then their use will be minimized.
(Innovations do break through, of course, even from people denied those things. But even the richest elites would be better of if nobody had to overcome those barriers.)
Might !== right.