For those deeply interested in different takes on Arthur, Steinbeck [0] took a stab at it too. This sent me down a long Arthurian rabbit hole.
[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Acts_of_King_Arthur_and_...
For those deeply interested in different takes on Arthur, Steinbeck [0] took a stab at it too. This sent me down a long Arthurian rabbit hole.
[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Acts_of_King_Arthur_and_...
In the Arthurian fanfic verse, a few authors get famous enough that they form a kind of accepted canon. You're likely to read Malory in school, because the faculty likes the Malory version.
Try telling your teacher that you disagree with their headcanon.
https://www.npr.org/2021/05/28/1001309335/a-young-john-stein...
I've just searched out some news stories about this and, apparently, Steinbeck destroyed some manuscripts he'd written under the Peter Pym pseudonym, but not this one; apparently he had also tried to get it published.
Arrrgh! I so hope that this sees the light of day at some point - or, er, the light of the Moon.
(someone DV'd my original post, at some point, and I'm not sure if this is why [maybe it was for some other reason entirely] but I intended my use of the term "propaganda" in a descriptive, neutral sense—that's what it is, and what it was intended to be)
I am generally favorable to a lot of what Steinbeck did with his treatment, other than "vamping up" Morgan le Fey, which seemed a bit too dime store novel of a characterization to me.
Otherwise he does a great job getting into the psychology of the knight characters. The published version also includes a great number of his letters on his process, showing how Steinbeck himself was on a sort of spiritual grail quest in trying to get to an authentic version of the telling.
If you are into the Arthurian literature as it jumped from the medieval to the modern, this is a great book to add to your collection.
Last note: be forwarned that Steinbeck never really finished his book. He spent years doing the research, but never really wrapped the stories with a bow. Just appreciate the tales he does tell, and how he tells them. You already know how the story ends.
In this version it's the Red Knight who is strongest at noon (IIRC).
"According to the Vulgate Mort Artu, Gawain had been baptised as an infant by a miracle-working holy man, also named Gawain, who named the boy after himself, and the following day announced that every day at noon, at the hour of the baptism, his power and strength will increase."
It sounds like a Hollywood addition to the story, so maybe a movie?
I think it might have been Gawain now that you mention it. Pretty sure it started with a G so I kept thinking Gallahad.
EDIT: Found it! Sir Gareth!