My grandfather had lung cancer twice. He quit smoking after the first time. His wife couldn't. She spent 10 years in long, slow COPD decline after he passed.
Don't fucking do it. And don't buy fucking nicotine vapes, either. Fuck those assholes.
My grandfather had lung cancer twice. He quit smoking after the first time. His wife couldn't. She spent 10 years in long, slow COPD decline after he passed.
Don't fucking do it. And don't buy fucking nicotine vapes, either. Fuck those assholes.
https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/quit-smoking/using-e-cigarettes...
It's been 2 years since quitting - started at 17 and quit age 39 as a very heavy smoker (20 pack + a day). I have always been very active but found my lung capacity, endurance and ability to perform are all much increased. I used to get the occasional chest pain and those have gone now, too. I just hope I havent done too much damage and can enjoy my kids, my garden, my physicality.. for as long as I can - my father in law has COPD and it is not a pretty end to a guy who used to be very a strong, physically capable guy.
I would encourage anyone to quit tobacco by whatever reasonable means & (my hunble) experience tells me vaping is way better than tobacco smoking.
Refer to how “science” covered smoking for decades, how eating fat was thought to be harmful for decades, how major economists missed every single crisis, and how many economist-led mutual funds went bust. And also who sponsored each research.
Of course, it’s not how it works in “real” sciences like physics, because criteria on research results are very strict there. But you should by default be very skeptical about any groundbreaking results in social sciences.
It’s a “vaping has far fewer toxic chemicals compared to cigarette smoke” type science.
How smokers’ habits change with vaping? Do they vape more often than they had smoked? Is vaping more social, hence more people get “sucked in”? Do children start vaping earlier? Long term, is starting vaping better than trying to stop smoking?
So many facets, so much beyond “we found this number smaller, therefore we recommend smokers to vape now”
I think there’s also some sort of negative cardiovascular symptoms, but I would be unsurprised if caffeine had its own.
> Nicotine constricts blood vessels, including those in the skin and coronary blood vessels, but dilates blood vessels in skeletal muscle. Vasoconstriction of the skin results in reduced skin blood flow and reduced fingertip skin temperature.
edit: smoking is carcinogenic, but how much of it is because of nicotine I wouldn't know; a smoker might not live long enough to find out at what age the cancer develops if he drops dead because of the heart infarct.
Have any evidence to support this novel claim?
Which one did you have in mind, and why do you say certainly?
The vapes don't have the MAOIs, which could also be why my brother didn't find them very satisfying (apart from the THC vapes).
You also inhale less matter than with an ecig, so I think it may end up being healthier... but I'm like, the only person I know that does this daily so science may never know.
Nicotine is as harmful as caffeine, no more, no less. Nobody's going around campaigning against Big Espresso.