The best way to shut down rational discussion in an area is to promote sensational lunacy. Then everyone self censors to avoid sanctioning the lunatics. This is not entirely irrational… many of the nuts in question are really toxic and dangerous. Things like racism and antivax hysteria kill people.
Most of that stuff is grassroots, but it could certainly be weaponized. For example if I were a pharma company and wanted to cover up a problem with a vaccine I would promote hysterical antivax bullshit. That way you make it impossible to rationally discuss problems with vaccines. If I were running a child trafficking operation I would promote Qanon.
This phenomenon is not new per se but social media renders it devastatingly powerful today.
I don’t see a good solution. Every solution is either “let society be overrun by cults of idiots” or “implement some kind of exclusionary elitism or totalitarianism.”
Maybe the solution is for some well meaning person to purchase and erase Facebook and YouTube. That would at least render the problem less acute.
You can also not claim that this lunacy will be believed by innocents if you do not fight the information itself. That isn't ignoring it and elevates the claims in the first place.
Everyone that claims there is an "infodemic" probably just wants sensationalism where they can put crazy on pedestals for clicks.
Society won't be overrun be a cult of idiots, some just hold companies hostage to nudge them to censor undesirable content. There was bullshit on Youtube since its inception. It only became a problem when people said it is.
The problem isn’t doing your own research. It’s failing to understand or discern and falling for sensationalism.
You have to either know enough to understand the primary material or know enough about the nature of expertise to discern who likely knows what they are talking about.
If you can’t do one of those things then you’re better off not trying to do your own research.