So in practice they have taken away the discover and pushed towards swiping removing any positives of their platform in the process. I have heard that many of the dating apps are now owned by 1 company. So if that is true, it makes sense from a shitty business perspective
Then they created Keybase, which was fantastic, before selling out to Zoom. Development has all but stopped.
This style of hit and run get what's mine is endemic to SV. Nobody takes responsibility for the lasting legacy of the things they build.
OkCupid was a safe haven for people who really wanted something genuine. It had a culture-wide effect the same way that Tinder cemented hook-ups as the New Normal of dating. We need to start taking responsibility for the things we make that touch millions of people.
Chris' Twitter [1] professes his love for making things. Yes but you don't love being a good steward of the things you build.
Ironically the old fashioned matchmaker who only took a fee after the wedding had much better aligned incentives.
Ironically, OKCupid wrote about this exact issue, explaining why membership incentives were bad, etc.
Then they were bought by Match.com, went to a membership based subscription model, and deleted that post.
And that, right there, is probably the key principle for a solid matchmaking app...
Of course there must be logistics against anuse/fraud. But that would align incentives.
- less social pressure to get married than for my grandparents
- less financial incentive through tax benefits already applying if you live together here (to not prefer any religous belief system)
edit: formatting
On the other hand my internal entrepreneur says that it could be a great opportunity to launch okcupid2.0 given that there's an actual demand for this kind of site.
Dating sites were better in the 2000's. Yahoo personals? Craigslist? Even the old match.com were better than what we have now.