Nobody doubts the veracity of those documents... But the question "do you believe they actually were moles?" is an infallible predictor of who did a person vote for in the last couple decades.
Nobody doubts the veracity of those documents... But the question "do you believe they actually were moles?" is an infallible predictor of who did a person vote for in the last couple decades.
Pretty much all of history. We love it when facts supporting our beliefs are isolated in a single source. We also love it when a source is ambiguous enough to let us draw our own conclusions.
The lie of omission has a long track record of being effective. It has the benefit of being useful to the source and/or the receiver. There's redundancy in falsehood selectors. Either the source will lie or we, on the receiving end, will lie. The truth often doesn't stand a chance; somebody is gonna find a way to isolate.
Trust is not a behavior that is reliably rational. One could argue that it always has an element of emotional attachment to the familiar.
To be clear, documents show that he was secret informant in years 1970-1976, while he only became leader of Solidarność in 1980.