There's still no mobile friendly stylesheet. I wouldn't hold your breath.
There's still no mobile friendly stylesheet. I wouldn't hold your breath.
How do you vote without zooming?
Ever tried to touch "comments" on headline and accidentally clicked "hide"?
Ever tried to touch the "Hacker News" menu item and gone to "new"?
Everyone is used to these things, but they are textbook examples of bad mobile design.
I press the voting button. Most of the time I vote in the intended direction. I think. If I don't, well, there's no way to know.
We have better elements to use, but I must also say those tend to come with costs.
Right now, HN is so lean, fast and clean, I will gladly work a little to vote or do some action in return for what is otherwise one of the best "just read the discussion" presentations on mobile. It's a pleasure.
To quote something else, manually insert a greater than symbol at the start of every quoted paragraph,
> Like this
Which obviously doesn't indent nicely but is perfectly clear, and works well with HN's low formatting style.
Beyond code blocks having line wrap, the HN mobile stylesheet seems fine to me. What issue do you take with it?
There are multiple issues with using the desktop styling, but most are related to Fitt's law[1].
The whole UI is terrible for finger interactions, but the best example is the tiny upvote/downvote buttons immediately above/below each other well within the diameter of a normal finger. It's literally impossible to use that without zooming, and if you try to then there is no way to know if you vote up or down. It should be used in textbooks for how not to do a mobile interaction.
[1] https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/fitts-...
Let's keep the discussion honest. I have a high DPI phone screen, I'm at the normal text size for my device, and I regularly use those buttons without zooming with reasonable accuracy.
The hyperbole is not warranted here. While I agree touch targets could be bigger they are certainly not impossible to use reliably.