With what? A competing python library for Google BigQuery (referencing the article)?
I get what you're saying here, but I don't think this "gap for a competitor to fill" is accurate for all times that customer support has let you down.
I get what you're saying here, but I don't think this "gap for a competitor to fill" is accurate for all times that customer support has let you down.
I expect that the integration libraries probably work pretty well for most users, and implementing a database like BigQuery would be a massive amount of work. So this pretty much explains why Google isn't sprinting to fix this issue.