And also notable because everything is under an expensive license, so big performant servers is the cheaper option.
Edit: everything = Windows servers for their .NET app ( apparently in the process of migrating to .NET Core) and SQL Server
And also notable because everything is under an expensive license, so big performant servers is the cheaper option.
Edit: everything = Windows servers for their .NET app ( apparently in the process of migrating to .NET Core) and SQL Server
2018:
>This is the query pattern that caused StackOverflow.com to go offline yesterday:
https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/issues/13524
but on the other hand their tech stack site says: C# + ASP.NET MVC
instead of ASP.NET Core, but I don't think it is proof of anything.
EF Core (like ASP.NET Core) ran on .NET Framework until version 2.1. Everything after that requires .NET (Core).
As far as I know they have been using .NET Core (or just EF Core? would be weird to go EF Core + .NET Framework, I guess?) on prod in 2018:
>This is the query pattern that caused StackOverflow.com to go offline yesterday:
https://github.com/dotnet/efcore/issues/13524
So maybe they used some things on Linux and some things on Windows - those that couldnt be ported to .NET Core back in the days
It's not about the travel specifically, it's that servers and licenses are the cheapest cost of any company when compared to salaries, especially for engineering and sales.