May I please have a link to more information? I wasn't able to find anything, and this is very interesting.
https://news.mit.edu/2014/algorithm-recovers-speech-from-vib...
there's a reason sonar is acoustic and not light based
[0] http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Chemical/watabs.h...
This is fairly open secrets to the degree that it is secret at all so it probably also is no big secret that passive and active countermeasures are used to prevent these techniques.
Any satellite-based detection system would have to rely on catching the sub while on the surface. I'm positive this is being attempted constantly, but catching a sub at depth is an entirely different manner.
Subs would be detectable using magnetometers, except that they have electromagnets in them to hide their magnetometer footprint. Still, this is not perfect.
Large subs have somewhat detectable gravitometric footprints that could be observed from space, indeed.
Wastewater is probably cooled before release.
Very different from the idea of passing tons of seawater through a reactor and dumping it out. It's not like a jet engine flying through the sky.
There are also magnetic anomaly detectors (MAD) and various wake detection approaches.
Do these work all always? Probably not. But they work often enough to be researched and used.
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UC9bMgCQyFNaMPsK9GtzM5dQ is a good starting point.
We basically know nothing about what current NRO spy sats carry, or do we?