Android app works.
[0] https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/360027397692-Deskt...
This could just be a coincidence, but I suspect it's not. For all of its faults, Zoom calls are just much better than all of the other mainstream solutions I've tried, particularly with large groups.
Nothing to do with native or not; and pushing everything to a web-browser makes a really complicated bit of software with weird quirks and potential hidden bugs. Yes it’s more tested, but when your code paths are literally infinite- “more eyes” isn’t going to help.
pick your poison
I know that at least X11 is not sandboxed with snap/flatpak/etc., and there is no sandbox for macOS/Windows Zoom client, so using web client is infinitely more isolated.
What is exactly “for this”?
I’d really prefer a world where people don’t have to deeply distrust software, but still adhere to principle of least privilege where it is reasonable to do so. I feel like if I have to install software natively, it better be software with a decent track record from a trustworthy team. However we’re really at a worst of both worlds situation with Zoom. I don’t trust it at all, and it gets a ton of privileges that are only checked in the sense that there might be some scrutiny from researchers.
Not saying I never had issues with the WebRTC solutions, but honestly, at worst I just found myself refreshing the tab and going on my way. Meanwhile I’ve been warned against even trying Zoom for Linux as apparently it makes the old Skype for Linux look like a solid product.