Hacker News Reader

Comment by baxtr | Hacker News Reader

I think in reality 99.9% of all people don’t care at all about Apple doing this.

And 99.9% of people don't care if your algorithm is O(n) or O(n^2).

It literally does not matter what clueless people think or say about this subject. The informed 0.01% (that number isn't correct but whatever) have a huge influence on things and Apple has just as many incentives to please them as they do for the "I bought a 2K device to jack off and watch Netflix" crowd.

In reality, 99.9% of all people who don't understand this issue don't care at all about Apple doing this.

It's similar to pointing out that 99.9% of all people don't care about enabling robust, non-SMS-based 2FA on their bank account.

This speaks of a lack of knowledge about an important issue. It does not degrade the importance of the issue.

I‘d guess you could add a few more 9s to that. Almost all people either don’t care or like this. And if you do not fear (or do not understand) the implications and risks I see why they like what apple does. It’s one of the few topics where all of mankind (with very little exceptions) agrees: CSAM is bad! That’s why „we do it for the kids“ always works.

Within my circle, people do not care. They will continue to use Apple products because, "I have nothing to hide." That's what they told me when I brought it up.

My group is a bit more nuanced: most will likely stick with Apple since the effect is somewhat invisible to them, but this topic brought the question up of “should I stay on iPhone” - which is not a question you want to come up very often if you’re trying to sell these devices.

Do they allow you to look through their phones if they give that opinion?

I think I get your point but I don’t think that’s a fair question to ask. Allowing Apple (or any other big company) to scan my hardware or letting my friends scroll to it are the distinct „risks“. There may be stuff on their that’s neither illegal nor immoral but I still would not want my friends/relatives/acquaintances to see/discuss. Sure I‘d prefer that google/Apple would not care for my browser history as well, but that’s a less direct thread.

I think a lot of people don't even know it's a thing, because they don't pay attention to tech news or tech philosophy.

"Do you think Apple should install software on every phone that scans your device for files deemed wrongful to possess, then reports you to the authorities if such content is found?"

That's what Apple wants to do. And most people think that warrantless searches are pretty fucked up.

Today, those "files deemed wrongful" are images of children being abused. Tomorrow it's a video of a mass shooting that they think encourages copycats. The day after that, it's protest flyers or instructions on how to combat police during civil unrest.

And yes, the NCMEC is de facto an agent of the government.

If not higher.

Right now every company is already scanning your photos server side but somehow it's an issue if its client side ?

I think once people think this through a bit more it will blow over.

Yes it’s an issue client side. I’ve never uploaded a photo to iCloud. I have no plans to do so. Getting scanned server side is effectively opt-in. Them putting the scanning client side has measurable, though minimal effects, even if I continue not to use iCloud.

Not to mention that within a decade they’ll be scanning every image that passes through people’s phones.

Having things server side is an optional feature that has some value.

But not being able to trust the device itself makes it pretty much useless.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com