Hacker News Reader

Quite an unusual, but effective, way to mark something as a proof of concept that's dangerous to use:

From [1]: "This is as unsafe as it sounds and I don't recommend anyone do it outside of a testing environment."

> … I don't recommend anyone do it outside of a testing environment.

… which is exactly dow it is used in dapr

> This is only used in the test (and thus not.compiled and distributed in our binaries).

There's a teeny bit of a difference between using it to explore monkey patching a go executable and using in the test suite of a released project.

> > … I don't recommend anyone do it outside of a testing environment.

> … which is exactly dow it is used in dapr

Eh... There's a difference between "a testing environment" as used in that quote and "as part of an automated test" as you mean here.

To me the former implies an experimental and/or ad-hoc environment, while the latter implies a stable, production environment.

You don't have the right to use it, even in a testing environment. The license denys you the right to use it.

Yes, but at the same time demonstrates the code clearly so you could implement it yourself. I'd say this is code sharing aiming at zero reuse.