You are being willingly ignorant if you believe that. Look at the title of the article.
Whatever point you're trying to make, the contents of a headline is never sufficient evidence.
We don't have the time to post the 1,000s of examples over the past 18 months. There has been censorship galore.
If you have thousands of examples of censorship over the past 18 months that you can share, doesn't that disapprove your accusations of censorship? If there were censorship, you wouldn't be able to share any examples because the examples would be censored.